Claude Opus 5

https://news.ycombinator.com/rss Hits: 23
Summary

Claude Opus 5 is available today. It’s a thoughtful and proactive model that comes close to the frontier intelligence of Claude Fable 5 at half the price.On coding and knowledge work evaluations like Frontier-Bench and GDPval-AA, Opus 5 is the new state-of-the-art, though it remains behind Mythos 5 on cybersecurity tasks.Opus 5 is designed to be used every day: it works more efficiently than other models. It’s the new default model on Claude Max, and the strongest model on Claude Pro.Performance and cost-effectivenessClaude Opus 5 provides greatly improved performance for the same cost as its predecessor, Opus 4.8. The charts in this section show how performance changes according to the model’s effort setting, which customers can use to optimize for intelligence or conserve tokens for faster and cheaper results.Opus 5 excels on valuable software engineering tasks. For example, on Frontier-Bench v0.1, Opus 5 surpasses all other models, and more than doubles Opus 4.8’s performance at a lower cost per task. On CursorBench 3.2, at max effort, the model performs within 0.5% of Fable 5’s peak score, but at half the cost per task; it also achieves greater performance at a given cost than all other models on high, xhigh, and max effort.We see similar results on knowledge work and problem-solving tasks. For example:On ARC-AGI 3, an evaluation where the model has to solve novel problems, Opus 5’s score is three times as high as the next-best model.On Zapier AutomationBench, which measures whether models can complete business tasks from start to finish, Opus 5’s pass rate is around 1.5× the next-best model for the same cost per task. Even at its lowest effort setting, Opus 5 passes more tasks than any other model.On OSWorld 2.0, a computer use benchmark, Opus 5 outperforms every other model at any given cost, surpassing Fable 5’s best result at just over a third of the cost.It’s also our best and most cost-efficient model on several related evaluations:Opus 5 is a meaningful i...

First seen: 2026-07-24 17:28

Last seen: 2026-07-25 15:44